Legal Opinion
Bunnam v. Olsten Quality Care
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 13, 1996No. 95-1739PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SHIVERS, Senior Judge.
Elizabeth Dunnam (“Dunnam”) appeals a workers’ compensation order denying com-pensability based upon application of the “going or coming” rule contained in section 440.092(2), Florida Statutes (1993). Finding that the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC), in denying compensability, did not properly construe section 440.092(4), Florida Statutes (1993), we reverse.
Dunnam, 26, was injured in an automobile accident on November 7, 1993. At the time of the accident, Dunnam was employed by Olsten Quality Care and was required to provide care to patients in their homes. Dunnam was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Naranja Rock Co. v. Dawal FarmsSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Povia Bros. Farms v. VelezSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- UNIVERSITY OF FLA., INSTITUTE OF AGR. v. KarchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Kash-N-Karry v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
3Cited by1 opinion
- McCormick v. State-Auditor General/Division of Risk ManagementDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000