Legal Opinion

David Barghoorn v. Ken Clark

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 3, 2016No. 15-15197Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner David Bargh-oom appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 USC § 2254(d) habeas corpus petition challenging his conviction in the Superior Court of California, Amador County. At his trial, Barghoorn was convicted of two counts of committing a forcible lewd act on a child under the age of 14 years (Counts I and II of the indictment), see Cal. Pen. Code § 288(b)(1), and one count of continuous sexual abuse of a child under the age of 14 years (Count III of the indictment), see Cal. Pen. Code § 288.5. Counts I and II each required proof of one act of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Middleton v. McNeilSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Medley v. RunnelsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Dennis Mark La Crosse,petitioner-Appellant v. Peggy Kernan, Warden Attorney Generalof the State OfcaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API