Legal Opinion
In re the Probate of the Will of Sheeler
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided January 19, 1948PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Witmer, S.
Respondent petitioned for his appointment as administrator of the estate of his deceased wife. Proponent *895appeared in opposition, filed an alleged will of said decedent and petitioned for its probate. The Central Trust Company of Eochester was appointed temporary administrator herein by this court pending the determination of the issues raised, and it is still acting as such.
On the return date of the petition for probate of the will respondent asked to have a date fixed for his preliminary examination of the witnesses to the will. Proponent objected to such examination, filed an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Claim of Raymond v. Estate of DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- In Re the Probate of the Will of DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- In Re the Probate of the Will of CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Noll v. RuprechtNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Noll v. RuprechtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Estate of RoblesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1972
- In re the Probate of the Will of SheelerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
- Rubin v. Irving Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1951