Legal Opinion

STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. LARRY DEAN MOORE

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 2016No. SD34170PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDon E. Burrell, J.

Larry Dean Moore (“Defendant”) challenges his conviction after a bench trial for failing to register as a sexual offender. See section 589.425.1. 1 Defendant’s point on appeal claims “the evidence did not prove” that he had changed his residence and then “knowingly failed to register a change of residence within the required three days.” Finding no merit in this claim, we affirm.

Applicable Principles of Review and Governing Law

We review the sufficiency of the evidence in a court-tried criminal case “by applying the same standard used in a jury-tried case.” State v. Holman, 230 S.W.3d 77, 82…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. NashSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  2. State of Missouri v. Christopher Eric HuntSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  3. State v. HolmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. JacobsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. State v. YoungerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GrahamMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. STATE OF MISSOURI v. ERIC CHRISTOPHER GIBBSMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. LONNIE STULL TILTON, JR.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2023
  4. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. MICHAEL PAUL SHANDSMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API