Legal Opinion

Silverstein v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 13, 1974No. 74-2607PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The diversity question presented for decision by this appeal concerns the coverage extended under the oft-interpreted “Temporary Substitute” and “Newly Acquired” provisions of an automobile liability insurance policy. The quirk arose because the automobile involved in this particular accident was owned by the insured when the policy was written.

Arnold Fedele, the insured, had purchased a 1962 Chevrolet automobile in 1968 and had driven it until it became inoperable in 1971. He did not sell this vehicle. In October of 1971, Fedele purchased a 1961 Austin Healy, and at that time purchased from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Larry Luke, Individually v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. Larry Luke, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  2. Glens Falls Insurance Company v. A. R. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reciprocal Exchange v. Iver NolandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  2. Allstate Insurance Co. v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Roslyn Silverstein, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Nathan Silverstein v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Hartford Accident& Indemnity Company, No. 74-2607 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of N.Y., 5th Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part ICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API