Legal Opinion
King v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
Decided October 17, 2002No. 06-01-00147-CRPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Chief Justice MORRISS.
Carl Dean King appeals from his convictions for aggravated sexual assault. For each offense, the jury assessed his punishment at life in prison and a fíne of $10,000.00. On appeal, King contends that the evidence was factually and legally insufficient to support his convictions, and that his trial counsel was ineffective.
The jury found King guilty of the following offenses: (1) aggravated sexual assault by penetration of the victim’s sexual organ by the defendant’s sexual organ; (2) aggravated sexual assault by penetrating the mouth of the victim with…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Brandy Lashay Cooks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2013
- Kenneth Charles Hunt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011
- Kenneth Charles Hunt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011
- Kenneth Gregory Knight v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2022
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.