Pinegar v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Patrick Pinegar appeals the district court’s order affirming the Commissioner’s decision denying his application for Supplemental Security Income. We review de novo the district court’s order affirming the denial of benefits. Tommasetti v. Astrue, 533 F.3d 1035, 1038 (9th Cir.2008). We may reverse the Commissioner’s decision only if it is not supported by substantial evidence or is based on legal error. Robbins v. Soc. Sec. Admin., 466 F.3d 880, 882 (9th Cir.2006). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Pinegar claims that the ALJ did not properly characterize…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Tommasetti v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Gordon Stout v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- (SS) Knak v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021