Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lester

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 23, 1990No. 684PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

In this factually unique appeal, Arthur Lester, appellant, alleges that the police promised him sexual rendezvous with his wife and lovers in exchange for his cooperation/confession in a murder investigation. (The record indicates that the police honored their promises.) Lester contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to introduce evidence at the suppression hearing to demonstrate that his confession was involuntary since it was induced by the promises of sexual services made by the police. Lester further asserts that counsel’s stewardship was deficient in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. EilandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. PetrasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. HubbleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GroomeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  2. Holloway v. HornDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Com. v. Desrivieres, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Com. v. Franklin, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
  5. Com. v. Lark, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API