State v. Dean
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGrimes, J.
I dissent from that part of the opinion of the court holding that the legislature may prohibit the suspension of sentences, but concur in the remainder.
In my view, such a statutory provision is a clear violation of the separation of powers. The separation of powers is fundamental to our system of government and is essential to the preservation of the liberty of our people. To preserve this separation, the judicial department must resist all enroachments upon its power whenever the issue is presented to it.
The court recognizes that the power to suspend sentences “has long been held typically…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. McCoyIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
- Merrill v. SherburneSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1818
- State v. BurroughsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Buckley v. DrewSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1909
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.