Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Fontaine Ferry Enterprises, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided January 30, 1959PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Judge.

In this action plaintiff, John E. Schmidt, sought to recover damages from defendant, Fontaine Ferry Enterprises, Inc., for personal injuries allegedly caused by the latter’s negligence in the operation and maintenance of an amusement device known as a sliding board at its place of business, and upon which plaintiff was riding when he injured himself. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence the trial judge directed a verdict for defendant on the theory that he took his chance of injury from a known risk, so that defendant was relieved of responsibility. This appeal is from the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Poole v. Lutz & Schmidt, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  2. Murphy v. White City Amusement Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1926
  3. Boston & Maine R. R. v. JesionowskiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1946

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Amusement Slides Corp. v. LehmannSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  2. Atlanta Funtown, Inc. v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  3. Sadr v. Hager Beauty School, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1987
  4. Russo v. the Range, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Dean v. MartzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API