Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Long

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 27, 2006No. 05-5002/MCPublished

1DissentCrawford, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that despite the Department of Defense (DoD) log-on banner and Appellee’s consent to monitoring, she had both the subjective and objective expectation of privacy in e-mails seeking advice from her friends regarding concealing her drug use. This case impacts on the DoD policy as set forth in the banner. “DoD computer systems may be monitored for all lawful purposes.... Use of this DoD computer system, authorized or unauthorized, constitutes consent to monitoring of this system.” This banner, which appears on nearly all DoD systems, constitutes…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API