People v. Peterson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*642The record, taken as a whole (see People v Providence, 2 NY3d 579, 583 [2004]), demonstrates that defendant made a knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to counsel. The court conducted a thorough inquiry, in which it fully warned defendant of the risks of self-representation (see e.g. People v Peterson, 273 AD2d 88, 89 [2000] [same defendant]). Defendant’s lack of legal knowledge and difficulties in representing himself were not grounds for denying or revoking pro se status (see People v Ryan, 82 NY2d 497, 507 [1993]). “Ineptitude, inherent in almost any case of self-representation, is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. RamosNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- People v. ProvidenceNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018