Legal Opinion

Twomey v. Twomey

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 5, 1990No. 89-1780Published

1Per curiam

Finding that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to modify rehabilitative alimony because appellee failed to file her motion within the five year rehabilitative period, we are compelled to vacate the trial court order and remand for dismissal. See section 61.14, Fla.Stat.; Wright v. Wright, 559 So.2d 1193, 1195 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Glover v. Glover, 548 So.2d 863 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Paulk v. Paulk, 504 So.2d 790 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Griffin v. Griffin, 502 So.2d 1315 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Pratt v. Pratt, 502 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Pujals v. Pujals, 414 So.2d 228 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982);…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lee v. LeeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  2. Pujals v. PujalsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Gedney v. GedneySupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  4. Veach v. VeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Myrick v. MyrickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API