Legal Opinion

In the Interest of Doe

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1992No. 15299PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

MOON, J.

Minor John Doe (Minor) appeals from the order of the Family Court of the First Circuit, adjudicating him a law violator under Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 571-11(1),1 based on its ruling that he was in possession of a “butterfly” knife in violation of HRS *90§ 134 — 52. Minor raises two points on appeal: 1) whether a butterfly knife is prohibited as a type of switchblade knife under HRS § 134 — 52; and 2) whether HRS § 134-52 is unconstitutionally vague as applied to butterfly knives. Based on the language and legislative history of § 134 — 52, we conclude that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stewart A. Taylor, D/B/A Taylor Cutlery Mfg. Co. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. Taylor v. McManusDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JhunHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Richards v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1994
  3. Tax Appeal of Director of Taxation v. Medical Underwriters of CaliforniaHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Teter v. ConnorsDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API