In the Interest of Doe
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
MOON, J.
Minor John Doe (Minor) appeals from the order of the Family Court of the First Circuit, adjudicating him a law violator under Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 571-11(1),1 based on its ruling that he was in possession of a “butterfly” knife in violation of HRS *90§ 134 — 52. Minor raises two points on appeal: 1) whether a butterfly knife is prohibited as a type of switchblade knife under HRS § 134 — 52; and 2) whether HRS § 134-52 is unconstitutionally vague as applied to butterfly knives. Based on the language and legislative history of § 134 — 52, we conclude that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stewart A. Taylor, D/B/A Taylor Cutlery Mfg. Co. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Taylor v. McManusDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1986
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. JhunHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- Richards v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1994
- Tax Appeal of Director of Taxation v. Medical Underwriters of CaliforniaHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
- Teter v. ConnorsDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2020