Legal Opinion

In re Manderson

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 16, 1892PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey. Petition for the condemnation of lands belonging to Andrew Manderson and others for the use of the United States. Tho petition was dismissed below for want of authority in the government to maintain, the proceeding. 48 Fed. Rep. 896. The writ of error was sued out to review this judgment.

1Opinion of the Court

Wales, District Judge.

Proceedings were instituted in the court below for the condemnation of certain lands lying within the state of New Jersey, and which are required by the United States for continuing the improvement of the harbor at Philadelphia. A petition was filed by the proper officer of tbe government, describing the lands necessary to be taken, naming their owners, and setting forth the substance of the several acts of congress which, it is alleged, authorize the said proceedings. The acts of congress referred to in the petition are:(1) The act of March 3, 1891, entitled “An act…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Albert Hanson Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Yarborough v. North Carolina Park CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Atlantic Fruit Co. v. Red Cross LineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  4. White v. Central Dispensary and Emergency HospitalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  5. Suncrest Lumber Co. v. North Carolina Park CommissionDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API