Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Decessna

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1950No. 32061PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

When plaintiff’s motion to certify was allowed, this court entertained the view that probably an important principle of law was involved upon which the court should make pronouncement, to wit, whether the acceptance of the stipulated' rental by a lessor from his lessee, after a claimed cause for the forfeiture of the lease had occurred, other than nonpayment of rent, operated to waive the right of the lessor to continue to rely on such claimed ground of forfeiture to terminate the lease and regain possession of the premises. An examination of the record, however, shows that such matter need…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Conant v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API