Legal Opinion

Barbour v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 25, 2004No. CR-00-1731PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

Christopher D. Barbour appeals from the circuit court's denial of his petition for postconviction relief, filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P. On June 24, 1993, Barbour was convicted of three counts of capital murder for the killing of Thelma Bishop Roberts. The murder was made capital because it was committed during the course of a first-degree rape, a first-degree burglary, and a first-degree arson. See § 13A-5-40(a)(3), (a)(4), and (a)(9), Ala. Code 1975.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. District Attorney's Office for Escambia CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  2. Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  3. Washington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  4. Madison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  5. Ingram v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API