Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 13, 1987PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins appeals the summary denial of his pro se petition for writ of error coram nobis wherein he alleges ineffective assistance of counsel because trial counsel failed to "investigate, explore and conduct" his case. Jenkins offers no facts to support this allegation; thus, this allegation is not cognizable. Stephens v. State, 420 So.2d 826 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982). He further alleges that trial counsel failed to appeal his conviction after being requested to do so. The state filed no pleadings and, hence, does not refute this allegation. A deliberate failure by defense counsel to perfect an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stephens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  2. Mead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  3. Populus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dobyne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000
  2. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  4. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API