Legal Opinion

Meissner v. Caravello

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 7, 1955No. Gen. 46,348PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Friend

George Meissner filed a complaint, in the superior court, to foreclose a mechanic’s lien for carpenter work, against Salvatore Caravello, as lessee, and Ralph and Florence Fick, husband and wife, and Robert A. De Rose, as owners, of an existing building located at 2902-04 West Armitage avenue in Chicago. Ilice Construction Company, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, filed an intervening petition to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, claiming $5,724 for masonry work and material furnished in the same alteration and improvement of the building. The lessee Caravello was defaulted for failure to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zeigler v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Douglas Lumber Co. v. Chicago Home for IncurablesIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Bairstow v. Northwestern UniversityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. StateIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Ethyl Corp. v. Forcum-Lannom Associates, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. McCabe/Marra Co. v. City of DoverOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Measday v. SweazeaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Pascal P. Paddock, Inc. v. GlennonIllinois Supreme Court · 1964

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API