Legal Opinion

Bienenstock v. Federal Insurance

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided November 5, 1973PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNat H. Hentel, J.

This matter was submitted for the court’s determination upon an agreed statement of facts. It is conceded that an underground pipe within the plaintiff’s residence building line, and under his front lawn froze on February 13, 1973, and that plaintiff, as a consequence, paid $855 to correct the situation. The plumber’s bill for repairs states: “ Answer[ed] emergency call found water main had frozen and cracked in lawn causing flood, when thawed. Dug up street. ’ ’ No question was raised with respect to the reasonableness of this bill.

Plaintiff sues defendant under a homeowner’s insurance…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Forman v. Home InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hudson v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Gellerman v. Allstate InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API