Legal Opinion

J.D.C. v. M.E.H.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 7, 2013No. 2D12-719PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KHOUZAM, Judge.

J.D.C., the Father, appeals a final judgment of paternity entered in his suit against M.E.H., the Mother. Although we find no error in the parenting plan the trial court fashioned, we agree with the Father that the trial court erred in concluding that the Father engaged in vexatious litigation by challenging the findings and conclusions in a social investigation report. In addition, the trial court’s calculations of the support award contain inconsistencies as to the Father’s income and health insurance. Consequently, we reverse and remand on those issues only.

The Father filed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moakley v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. Kern v. KernSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  3. Bennett v. BergesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  4. Leinenbach v. LeinenbachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  5. Landers v. LandersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rush v. BurdgeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. Rush v. BurdgeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API