Legal Opinion

(PS) Roberts v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 30, 2025No. 2:22-cv-01699Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 SYDNEY BROOKE ROBERTS and No. 2:22-cv-1699 DJC AC DAVID TYRONE SAMUEL, 11 Plaintiffs, 12 ORDER v. 13 SACRAMENTO HOUSING & 14 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the court on a motion to compel brought by plaintiffs. ECF No. 112. This 18 discovery motion was referred to the magistrate judge pursuant to E.D. Cal. R. 302(c)(1) and 19 302(c)(21). The parties submitted the required joint statement (ECF No. 122) and also submitted 20 responsive briefing (ECF Nos. 118, 123).…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. In re Heritage Bond LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API