eCAST Settlement Corp. v. Vaughn (In Re Vaughn)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARY D. FRANCE, Bankruptcy Judge.
How is a debtor’s “projected disposable income” calculated for chapter 13 plan confirmation purposes? This determination is significant because the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005, Pub.L. No. 109-8, 119 Stat. 23 (2005) (“BAPCPA”), provides that if a party in interest objects to a debtor’s proposed plan, it may not be confirmed unless the debtor either pays 100% of the allowed unsecured claims or devotes all of his “projected disposable income” for the applicable commitment period to pay unsecured creditors. 11 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re HardacreUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dehart v. Hay (In Re Hay)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Dehart v. Ponce (In Re Ponce)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009