Legal Opinion

Enid Corporation v. Mills

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 13, 1958No. 57-200PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

101 So.2d 906 (1958)

ENID CORPORATION, a Florida corporation; Trinity Corporation, a Florida corporation; and The Mackle Company, Inc., Appellants,

v.

H.L. MILLS and Kathryn Mills, t/d/b/a H.L. Mills Construction Company, Appellees.

No. 57-200.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

March 13, 1958.

Rehearing Denied April 30, 1958.

Williams, Salomon & Katz and Richard P. Kenney, Miami, for appellants.

Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder, Atkins, Carson & Wahl, Miami, for appellees.

PEARSON, Judge.

The appellants were defendants in an action brought in equity by the appellees to enforce a lien for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Strong & Trowbridge Co. v. H. Baars & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1910
  2. Glass v. WiesnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  3. Poranski v. MillingsSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  4. Moon v. WilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1930

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Central Properties, Inc. v. RobbinsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Greater NY Corp. v. Cenvill Miami Beach Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. David v. RichmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. J. Vincent O'Neill v. Corporate Trustees, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  5. Glosser v. VasquezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API