Legal Opinion

Micari v. Monroe Stone Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1908No. Docket No. 24PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Monroe; Lockwood, J. Case by Angelo Micari against the Monroe Stone Company for personal injuries. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

Plaintiff was injured while employed by defendant in its stone quarry. The stone was taken from the place it was quarried on a four-wheeled tram car along a track to a turntable, and then down a track to the foot of the incline, where it was hoisted up into the mill, emptied, and returned to the track and pushed back to the quarry. The turntable was the central point of several diverging tracks which ran from it to different parts of the quarry. Plaintiff and another who worked with him had used the car in question for about 14 months before the accident. They were paid by the ton or load.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Powers v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Howe v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Frebes v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Beach v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Green v. JenningsArizona Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Groesbeck v. Grand Trunk Railway Co. of CanadaMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API