Legal Opinion

Herman v. Pepper

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 7, 1934No. Appeal, 311PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

This case is before us for tbe second time. On tbe former appeal we held (311 Pa. 104) that a deed from plaintiff to one of bis copartners, tbe defendant John W. Pepper, was simply a mortgage and did not bar plaintiff from having tbe partnership dissolved. We therefore sent tbe case back for a dissolution of tbe partnership and an accounting and settlement of tbe partnership affairs. Such has been bad, and tbe cause is again before us.

Tbe decree dissolving tbe partnership was entered on June 13, 1933. By it tbe court appointed a receiver to operate tbe partnership…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bracht v. ConnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Herman v. PepperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Efner v. ReynoldsNebraska Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rosenfeld v. RosenfeldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Graziano Const. Co., Inc. v. LeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. One 1978 Lincoln Mark V.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Scheckter v. RubinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Kirby v. KalbacherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API