Legal Opinion

Weilandy v. Lemuel

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 15, 1871PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error to First District Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWagner, Judge

This was an action of ejectment, tried by consent of parties before the court, without the intervention of a jury. No instructions were ashed or given. The court, after hearing the evidence, found a verdict for the defendants and rendered judgment thereon. We can not weigh the evidence, and undertake to say whether it justified the finding and judgment of the court or not, and as no question of law is saved, the case can not be reversed. (Easley v. Elliott, 43 Mo. 289; Wilson v. North Missouri R.R. Co., 46 Mo. 36.)

This court will not review the evidence to find whether the Circuit Court has…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Easley v. ElliottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  2. Wilson v. North Missouri RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  3. Piercifield v. SnyderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1851

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In re Assessment of Collateral Inheritance Tax in Estate of LankfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  2. Cunningham v. SnowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  3. Jordan v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  4. Holden v. VaughanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  5. Taylor v. CayceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API