Briggs v. Briggs
New York Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment rendered at a special term. The facts appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Mason, J.
The defendants were copartners in the commission business, in the city of Albany, and the plaintiff consigned to them as such commission merchants, a quantity of lumber to sell on commission. After the lumber was received and a part of it sold, the copartnership between the defendants was dissolved and the defendant Briggs ceased to have any thing "to do with the business. The defendant Vose sold the lumber and did not account and pay over. The plaintiff heard *478of the dissolution about the last of July and before the defendant Yose had sold the balance of the lumber; but…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Perry v. . ChesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- American Guild v. . DamonNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Spofford v. . RowanNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Musselman v. GalligherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Newell v. Salmons & WashburnNew York Supreme Court · 1856
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.