Legal Opinion

Mendes v. New England Duplicating Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided December 14, 1950No. Civ. A. 50311PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWEENEY, Chief Judge.

In this action the plaintiff seeks an injunction against an alleged infringement of a registered trade-mark, and an accounting of profits. The defendant denies infringement and, in a counterclaim, seeks to have the plaintiff enjoined from an alleged intimidation of his customers, and a declaration that the plaintiff’s trade-mark No. 521,-322, issued on February 21, 1950, be declared invalid.

Findings of fact

Mendes, the plaintiff herein, invented a collating and tipping machine in 1939, and sometime thereafter called it a PADDY machine, this name being adapted from a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Columbia Mill Co. v. AlcornSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Dwinell-Wright Co. v. National Fruit Product Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
  4. Bulova Watch Co. v. StolzbergDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1947
  5. In re Leslie-Judge Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. La Societe Anonyme Des Parfums Le Galion v. Jean Patou, Inc. And Michael Stramiello, Jr., Collector of Customs of the Portof New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. Keebler Company v. Rovira Biscuit Corporation, Keebler Company v. Rovira Biscuit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  3. Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Procter & Gamble Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  4. State v. FramptonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  5. New England Duplicating Co., Inc. v. MendesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API