Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stuart-James Co. v. Division of Employment & Training

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 14, 1991No. 90CA0430Published

1Dissent

Judge RULAND,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent from that part of the majority holding which sets aside the Panel’s disposition of the equal protection argument.

I recognize that our supreme court in Kinterknecht v. Industrial Commission, 175 Colo. 60, 485 P.2d 721 (1971) held that the proper forum for presentation of evidence in support of an equal protection challenge is the district court in conjunction with a declaratory judgment action. However, if, as here, that issue may be determined based upon the record before the administrative tribunal, in my view, the better approach is for an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kinterknecht v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  2. Clasby v. KlapperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. Higgs v. Western Landscaping & Sprinkler Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. Lucchesi v. StateColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Industrial Commission v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API