Legal Opinion
Lindsey Ross, by and Through Her Parents and Next Friends, Michael and Diane Ross v. Board of Education of Township High School District 211
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 11, 2007No. 06-2060PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, Circuit Judge.
In this case, as in its companion Board of Education of Township High School District 211 v. Ross, 486 F.3d 267 (7th Cir.2007) (“Ross I”), decided today, Lindsey Ross and her parents ask us to consider Lindsey’s claim that Township High School District 211 violated her rights in various ways during her high school years. Lindsey, who is afflicted with Rett syn drome, a neurodevelopmental disorder that strikes girls almost exclusively, claims here through her parents that she is not bound by a settlement agreement that her parents signed on her behalf when she was a minor.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Banks v. County of AlleghenyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Bernstein v. BankertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Czarniecki v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Morales v. BezyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Darrell Cannon v. Jon BurgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.