Legal Opinion

Weaver v. Shriver

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 21, 1894PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from, the Superior Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. Exception — The plaintiff offered the two following prayers: 1. If the jury believe that the defendant falsely represented to the plaintiff, with knowledge at the time of the falsity of such representations, that the plaintiff, when he purchased the fifty shares of stock in The Loomis Filter Company at $100 per share, being par for the same, was paying the same price for said…

Read the full summary

Appeal from, the Superior Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. Exception — The plaintiff offered the two following prayers: 1. If the jury believe that the defendant falsely represented to the plaintiff, with knowledge at the time of the falsity of such representations, that the plaintiff, when he purchased the fifty shares of stock in The Loomis Filter Company at $100 per share, being par for the same, was paying the same price for said stock which all the other holders thereof paid, and that no shareholder had gotten his stock at any less figure, and that…

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

This is an action of deceit brought to recover damages for alleged false representations, claimed to have been made by the defendant to the plaintiff in the sale of certain stock of the Loomis Filter Company of Baltimore City. The grounds upon which the plaintiff seeks to recover are, that about the first of September, 1891, the defendant represented to him that he was largely interested in the stock of said company, and familiar with its affairs, which he represented to be in a good and prosperous condition; that all the stockholders had paid par value for their stock, which was one hundred…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cooper v. SchlesingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. McAleer v. HorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
  3. Buschman v. CoddCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  4. Lefler v. . FieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. Groff v. HanselCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Empire Realty Co. v. FleisherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  2. Hinkle v. Rockville Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  3. Cahill v. ApplegarthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
  4. Olson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Stearns v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API