Johnson v. Texas Employers Insurance Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKeith, Justice
This is a most unusual case.
Plaintiffs employer determined that he was an employee within the meaning of § 902(3), Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act [33 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-50 (Supp.1977) amending portions of 33 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-50 (1970)], hereinafter “LHWCA”; the plaintiff agreed in this determination by accepting some $3,000 from Bethlehem in payment of benefits under LHWCA; and, now this court has agreed that the parties made the correct determination of coverage: Plaintiff was, indeed, covered as a beneficiary under LHWCA when he was injured. I concur in the first section of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Northeast Marine Terminal Co. v. CaputoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Nacirema Operating Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Federal Underwriters Exchange v. PughTexas Supreme Court · 1943
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.