Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bellevue School District v. E.S.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 2011No. 83024-0Published

1ConcurrenceMadsen, C.J.

¶27 (concurring) — I agree with the majority that there is no due process right to counsel at the initial *715truancy hearing. However, I also agree with the Court of Appeals that the concerns identified in its opinion, Bellevue School District v. E.S., 148 Wn. App. 205, 199 P.3d 1010 (2009), strongly suggest that an attorney could facilitate a better outcome in these cases for the child, the family, and for the district as well. Accordingly, I urge the legislature to consider enacting a statute to provide for counsel at these hearings, similar to the American Bar Association House of Delegates’…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bellevue School Dist. v. ESCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  2. Bellevue School District v. E.S.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API