Legal Opinion

Daiquana Coles v. City of Rochester, Rochester Public Library

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided March 27, 2026No. 6:22-cv-06407Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAIQUANA COLES, DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff, v. 6:22-CV-06407 EAW CITY OF ROCHESTER, ROCHESTER PUBLIC LIBRARY, Defendants. INTRODUCTION Pro se plaintiff DaiQuana Coles (“Plaintiff”) brings this action asserting claims pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990,

42 U.S.C. §§ 12112-12117

(“ADA”), the New York State Human Rights Law, New York Executive Law § 290, et seq. (“NYSHRL”), and the City of Rochester Code, alleging that defendants the City of Rochester and Rochester Public Library (“Defendants”) discriminated against…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API