Legal Opinion

Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bordeaux

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1934No. 24955. Department TwoPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.

— This action was brought by the Firestone Tire & Rubber Company against Leo Bordeaux to recover $390, a balance alleged to be due plaintiff on account of automobile tires sold and delivered to defendant. The defendant denied any indebtedness ■except the sum of $6.51, which was duly tendered to plaintiff before tbe institution of tbe action. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings and conclusions favorable to plaintiff in the sum of $385.86, for which sum judgment was entered. Defendant appeals.

Stripped of detail, the issue in the case is dependent upon…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Corbet v. WallerWashington Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Federal Rubber Co. v. M. M. Stewart Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API