Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bordeaux
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.
— This action was brought by the Firestone Tire & Rubber Company against Leo Bordeaux to recover $390, a balance alleged to be due plaintiff on account of automobile tires sold and delivered to defendant. The defendant denied any indebtedness ■except the sum of $6.51, which was duly tendered to plaintiff before tbe institution of tbe action. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings and conclusions favorable to plaintiff in the sum of $385.86, for which sum judgment was entered. Defendant appeals.
Stripped of detail, the issue in the case is dependent upon…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Corbet v. WallerWashington Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by1 opinion
- Federal Rubber Co. v. M. M. Stewart Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935