Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Jonap v. Norwick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 28, 1981Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGibbons, J.

Jack Schwartz and Leslie Jonap were partners in real estate deals involving the buying, selling, and/or improving of shopping centers, office buildings and apartment houses. One of their projects was the Shirley Shopping Center, which was owned by the two men along with Sydney Stein as tenants in common. Jonap and Schwartz conveyed their undivided one-third interests in the shopping center to their wives, plaintiff Mary Jonap and defendant Elaine Schwartz, respectively. Thereafter the shopping center was sold, with the purchaser agreeing to assume all mortgages of record on the property. One…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miller v. . SchlossNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Ball v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Paramount Film Distributing Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Bradkin v. LevertonNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Munoz v. . WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API