Legal Opinion
In re Saxton Furnace Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 15, 1905No. 1,837PublishedCited by 3 opinions
In Bankruptcy. On certificate from referee concerning claim of Westinghouse, Church, Kerr & Co.
1Opinion of the Court
J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.
The facts upon which this controversy arises are thus stated by the referee:
“(1) On August 4, 1902, Westinghouse, Church, Kerr & Co.'entered into a written contract with the Saxton Furnace Company, the bankrupt, which contract is attached as Exhibit A to the petition, by which contract Westinghouse, Church, Kerr & Co. agree to construct and erect two blowing engines for the Saxton Furnace Company, and the Saxton Furnace Company agree to pay therefor $42,000.
“(2) This contract was executed on behalf of the Saxton Furnace Com-' pany by Charles H. Scott, its…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Howard v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Owl Drug Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1935
- In re Mullings Clothing Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1916
- In re RubinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1919