Cox v. Commonwealth Oil Co.
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
GARZA, District Judge.
Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, Commonwealth Oil Company, attached *584the affidavit of W. Mack Crook to its brief in opposition to the motion for summary judgment of Third-Party Defendant Clayton Mark & Company. The affidavit related to tests made by the affiant as an expert engineer hired by Commonwealth to determine whether or not Clayton Mark & Company had manufactured a defective union.
Clayton Mark & Company then made application to take the oral deposition of W. Mack Crook, which was opposed by Commonwealth in its motion for an order with respect to the intention…
2Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1987
- North Georgia Lumber & Hardware v. Home InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1979
- Pimentel v. ROUNDUP COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982