Legal Opinion

McNeil v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 11, 1933PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

On October 20, 1928, at 9:30 p.m., the plaintiff left Boston for Quincy as a passenger in the rear car of a train of the defendant. He was a carpenter, sixty-seven years old, was a little deaf, wore big, heavy eyeglasses, and for many years had ridden from Boston to Quincy daily on the train. After stopping at Wollaston, the train started up, and some time later, when the train had slowed down and was moving slowly, the trainman Crouse opened the front door of the car and called out “Quincy” with the intention of notifying the passengers that the train was about to stop at the Quincy station.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Berkshire Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Stevens v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  3. Anderson v. Beacon Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Gerry v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  5. Floytrup v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HayesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  2. Kushner v. Dravo Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  3. Fiske v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Sherman v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  5. Cook v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API