Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Keator

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1877Published

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the trial of this action by the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the Court

BooKes, J.:

This action was brought to recover the value of a quantity of wheat, which grew on a strip of land previously conveyed by the plaintiff to the New York and Oswego Midland Railroad Company. The plaintiff sowed the wheat, and when it was grown the defendant harvested and removed the crop. The conveyance by the plaintiff to the railroad company was a grant in fee, subject to the following condition (among others which need not be here noticed), to wit: “ Said parties of the first part also to have the privilege of mowing and cultivating the surplus grounds of said strip of land not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nicoll v. . the New-York and Erie Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. Post v. PearsallCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
  3. Craig v. . WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  4. Gould v. GlassNew York Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Main v. GreenNew York Supreme Court · 1860

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API