O'Connell v. Gillespie
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Putnam Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.
This was an action by Gillespie against O'Connell, for the forcible entry and detainer of a certain town lot, brought before the mayor of the town of Green-castle, and appealed to the Circuit Court. Trial; verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.
The defendant asked a charge to the substantial effect that in order to entitle the plaintiff to recover, it was necessary that the defendant’s entry should have been unlawful and forcible, or, having- peaceably entered, that he should have forcibly detained the premises. This charge was refused, and the Court charged that the plaintiff must prove “…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Attorney General v. West Wisconsin Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
- Winterfield v. StaussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
- Kiphart v. BrennemenIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Gipe v. CumminsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Sturgeon v. HitchensIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.