Legal Opinion · Dissent
Employers Mutual Casualty Company v. Hart
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 6, 1967No. 41274Published
1DissentHalley, Chief Justice
(dissenting) :
In my opinion, the majority view in this case is incorrect. The decision of the majority contains the following statement:
“We have carefully examined Mr. Hart’s deposition, and his testimony at the trial, including his explanation for the conflicts between the two, and we cannot say that the trial court erred in accepting the latter as the truth. * * * we have weighed all of the evidence pertinent to the issue of whether or not Kenneth Randol was driving the Corvair (at the time of the collision) with its owner’s permission, and cannot say that the trial court’s findings and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Moral Insurance Co. v. StevesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Brown v. BivingsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Catlett v. JordanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Schaefer v. JG Stobaugh Supply CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955