Legal Opinion

City of Danville v. Hartshorn

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 16, 1971No. 11395PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mills

At first blush it would appear that this case is much ado about nothing. Rut is it? Is the violation of a municipal ordinance a civil case or a criminal one? If it is civil, is a trial by jury available and do the normal pre-trial discovery procedures apply? If it is criminal, is the right to a jury trial abated under the theory that it is a “petty” matter? Defendant-appellant and city-appellee at least agree that there are two issues posed in this appeal: (1) Whether a defendant is entitled to a jury trial in the prosecution of a city ordinance violation the penalty for which is only a fine,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. City of Decatur v. ChasteenIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Village of Maywood v. HoustonIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  5. City of Highland Park v. CurtisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Danville v. HartshornIllinois Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API