Legal Opinion

Kamke v. Clark

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1955Published

1OpinionCurrie, J.

(on motion for rehearing). Counsel for appellant Pabst Brewing Company request a rehearing on the ground that the amendment made to sec. 280.01, Stats., by sec. 375, ch. 541, Laws of 1935, had the effect of converting causes, of, action predicated upon sec. 280.01 from actions in equity to suits at law. This amendment was not mentioned in the original briefs, and the point now raised on the motion for rehearing presents an entirely new , issue not previously considered by us.

While plaintiffs’ complaint asks for an injunction to restrain further dumping as well as for an abatement of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Karns v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Stadler v. GriebenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Remington v. FosterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Denner v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Carthew v. City of PlattevilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API