Opinion No. 69-160 (1969) Ag
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
Revaluation Expenses — Unspent Money 1. If the county assessor does not spend all money appropriated to him for expenditure during the year on revaluation as provided in 68 O.S. 2481.4 [68-2481.4] (1968), the unspent money must be returned to the various recipients who appropriated it to him for expenditure. 2. The proceeds of mill rates voted for cooperative county and joint city county libraries, county health purposes, area school districts for vocational and technical schools, and school districts lying in more than one county are subject to the cost of revaluation. The Attorney General…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- City of Duncan Ex Rel. Board of Trustees of the Police Pension & Retirement System v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956