Legal Opinion

Hill v. Bloomer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1844Published

ERROR to the District Court for Dane County. Action of replevin commenced in the district court for Brown county, by Sill against Bloomer, October 12,1840, for 33Ó, 000 feet of pine lumber and.900 bushels of potatoes. At the May term, 1841, under the law attaching Portage county to Dane county for. judicial purposes, the cause was removed to the district court for Dane county.

Read the full summary

ERROR to the District Court for Dane County. Action of replevin commenced in the district court for Brown county, by Sill against Bloomer, October 12,1840, for 33Ó, 000 feet of pine lumber and.900 bushels of potatoes. At the May term, 1841, under the law attaching Portage county to Dane county for. judicial purposes, the cause was removed to the district court for Dane county. At the October term, 1841, of the Dane county district court, the defendant moved the court to quash the writ and dismiss proceedings for several reasons, which motion was sustained and interlocutory judgment rendered…

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

This was an action of replevin commenced by Hill against Bloomer, in the district court of Brown-county, and, in pursuance o'f an act of assembly attaching Portage county to the county of Dane for judicial purposes, it was certified to Dane county. In the district court of Dane county the defendant appeared, by his counsel, and moved the court to quash and dismiss the writ and proceedings for various irregularities in the same, which said motion was sustained by the court. On motion of defendant, by his counsel, the court then entered a.judgment against the plaintiff for the value of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gould v. BarnardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API