Legal Opinion

State v. Dixon

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 1984No. 47009PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants, Leroy Dixon, Jr. and April East, were indicted for eight counts of forgery, eight counts of uttering, one count of grand theft and one count of receiving stolen property. On the day scheduled for trial, defense counsel informed the court that the state had not fully complied with his request for discovery. The court then ordered the state to grant discovery and submit a more detailed bill of particulars by 4:00 p.m. that day or face a dismissal with prejudice of their case.

The following morning, the court inquired whether the state had complied as ordered. Defense counsel stated…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. SuttonOhio Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. State v. EberhardtOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. State v. HicksOhio Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. City of Lakewood v. PfeiferOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. State v. Jones, 22521 (4-17-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. City of Cleveland v. SimpkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State v. LenardOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API