Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Brown v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 16, 2009No. 2-08-041-CRPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDauphinot, J.

filed a concurring and dissenting opinion.

I agree that involuntary intoxication is not a defense to driving while intoxicated (DWI) under the facts of this case. But to hold that it can never be a defense to DWI goes too far. I cannot join the majority in that sweeping statement; I therefore must respectfully dissent.

Courts have long struggled with the conflict between the due process requirement of criminalizing only conduct that involves both a culpable mental state and a criminal act (mens rea and actus reus) and the apparent intent of the legislature to dispense with the requirement of a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lomax v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. Ex Parte RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Ex Parte McCainCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. Torres v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Hearne v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API