Brown v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDauphinot, J.
filed a concurring and dissenting opinion.
I agree that involuntary intoxication is not a defense to driving while intoxicated (DWI) under the facts of this case. But to hold that it can never be a defense to DWI goes too far. I cannot join the majority in that sweeping statement; I therefore must respectfully dissent.
Courts have long struggled with the conflict between the due process requirement of criminalizing only conduct that involves both a culpable mental state and a criminal act (mens rea and actus reus) and the apparent intent of the legislature to dispense with the requirement of a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lomax v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Ex Parte RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Ex Parte McCainCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Torres v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Hearne v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.