Legal Opinion
Kinetic Systems, Inc. v. IPS-Integrated Project Services, LLC and Lonza Biologics, Inc.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided March 24, 2025No. 20-cv-1125-SMPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Kinetic Systems, Inc. v. Case No. 20-cv-1125-SM Opinion No.
2025 DNH 040
IPS-Integrated Project Services, LLC and Lonza Biologics, Inc. O R D E R Following jury verdicts in favor of Kinetic Systems, Inc. and Lonza Biologics, Inc., in this commercial construction contract case, all three parties moved for an award of attorneys’ fees under provisions in the Subcontracts. The primary issue is which of them is a “prevailing party” within the meaning of § 17.7 of the Subcontracts. For the reasons that follow, Kinetics’s motion is granted…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Higgins v. New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kinetic System, Inc. v. IPS-Integrated Project Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2025